Customer Facility Evaluation Report
¤ Indicates Required Fields
Test ID (if known):
¤ Customer Name:
¤ Email:
¤ Organization:
¤ Title:
¤ Project Name:
Facility:	Select a Facility 1x1 SWT 8x6 SWT 9x15 LSWT 10x10 SWT AeroAcoustic Propulsion Lab Advanced Subsonic Combustion Rig Electric Propulsion Lab Electric Propulsion Research Building Engine Components Research Lab Engine Research Building Icing Research Tunnel Plasma Interaction Facility Propulsion Systems Lab Research Combustion Lab Small Multi-Purpose Research Facility Other
Other Facility:
Test Start Date:	(mm/dd/yyyy)
Test End Date:	(mm/dd/yyyy)
I. Technical Performance
Data acquisition system capabilities:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Instrumentation accuracy:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Reliability of test results:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Format of test results:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Handling of hardware:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Safety of test:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Facility performance (as advertised):	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Meeting test objectives:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Overall technical performance:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments/Suggestions:
II: Schedule
Timeliness of testing:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Staff's response to unexpected delays:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Data delivery:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Overall schedule performance:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments/Suggestions:
III: Cost
Facility costs:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Explanation of facility costs:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Value of research gained:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Overall cost performance:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments/Suggestions:
IV: Interaction/Support Quality
Value of pre-test meetings:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Service provided by engineering staff:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Service provided by technician staff:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Communication throughout the test:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Overall interaction performance:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments/Suggestions:
V: Overall Satisfaction
¤ Overall satisfaction and test value:	Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments/Suggestions:
VI: Facility Improvements
What facility improvements and/or investments would you recommend?
VII: Additional Comments/Questions/Suggestions
¤ Indicates Required Fields

Thanks for your interest in using the research facilities at NASA Glenn Research Center.